Anti-Dilutive Securities and Earnings per Share

True Tamplin

Written by True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®
Updated on October 13, 2021

Definition and Explanation

When calculating earnings per share (EPS), including the effects of a potentially dilutive security sometimes produces a higher per-share figure. This effect is known as anti-dilution. In this article, three aspects of antidilution are discussed in more detail.

Opposite Effects on EPS Before and After Extraordinary Items

Under certain conditions, it is possible that the savings per share from a potentially dilutive security may be less than the EPS before extraordinary items but greater than the EPS after extraordinary items.

Despite this result, the anti-dilutive security should be included in the calculation of a fully diluted EPS.

Example

Suppose that the Sample Company reports $7,000,000 as ordinary income and an extraordinary loss of $3,200,000.

It has an issue of preferred stock on which it paid $1,000,000 of dividends, and which is convertible to 400,000 common shares. The preferred stock is not considered to be equivalent to the common stock.

If there were 1,400,000 outstanding common shares, EPS calculations would be made as shown in the table below.
Earnings per Share Calculations for Extraordinary Loss
Despite the fact that the fully diluted EPS is larger than the primary EPS, both results must be disclosed.

Losses

When an ordinary loss occurs in a year, all potential savings from conversions and all potential increases in the number of shares are anti-dilutive. This is because the loss per share is reduced when they are included.

That is to say, the fully diluted loss per share would be smaller than the primary loss per share, and this result would not be consistent with the worst case assumption.

Example

Suppose that the Sample Company has a $7,000,000 operating loss and 1,400,000 outstanding shares, such that there is a $5 loss per share.

If warrants equivalent to 100,000 common shares are outstanding, including them would change the result to $7,000,000 / 1,500,000, or a loss of only $4.67 per share.

If bonds convertible to 200,000 shares can offer interest savings of $400,000, the result would be $6,600,000 / 1,600,000, or a loss of $4.13 per share.

Therefore, neither of these potentially dilutive securities (or any others) would be included in the calculation of EPS, even if they were common stock equivalents.

Multiple Dilutive Securities

When more than two potentially dilutive securities exist, anti-dilutive effects can be harder to detect.

The easiest approach to obtaining the most diluted EPS involves ranking the securities from most to least dilutive in terms of the savings per common share that would have been achieved if the shares had been issued.

Then, each is brought into the calculation of primary or fully diluted EPS until it is reduced to the smallest possible figure.

Example

To demonstrate, assume that the Sample Company has reported a net income of $1,000,000 divided among 100,000 shares, adjusted for common stock equivalents. Further, suppose that the following convertible bonds are outstanding:
Outstanding Convertible Bonds
Each of the bonds, as well as all of the bonds together, appears to be dilutive of the $10 primary EPS. If all of them are included, the EPS is $1,715,000 / 370,000, or $4.64, per share.

To determine if this point is maximum dilution, alternate calculations can be made. These calculations involve bringing in the savings and new shares in order from the most to the least dilutive.

Including only group A produces the result of $1,080,000 / 180,000, or $6, per share. This number is still larger than the total figure and the next group can be brought in.

Group B will be dilutive because its saving per share ($1.25) is less than the last diluted EPS result. Including it produces $1,205,000 / 280,000, or $4.30, per share.

Group C will not be dilutive because its savings per share of $4.50 is larger than the $4.30 just obtained. Thus, the $4.30 figure is the smallest fully diluted figure and should be reported on Sample’s income statement.

As verification, including groups A, B, and C produces $1,385,000 / 320,000, or $4.33.

True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®

About the Author
True Tamplin, BSc, CEPF®

True Tamplin is a published author, public speaker, CEO of UpDigital, and founder of Finance Strategists.

True contributes to his own finance dictionary, Finance Strategists, and has spoken to various financial communities such as the CFA Institute, as well as university students like his Alma mater, Biola University, where he received a bachelor of science in business and data analytics.

To learn more about True, visit his personal website, view his author profile on Amazon, his interview on CBS, or check out his speaker profile on the CFA Institute website.

Leave a Comment